Dummy![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Me![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
When dummy hit, I felt pretty good about my lead especially
when dummy played the ace and Danny encouraged with the nine.
Declarer crossed to his hand with the K
and floated the
Q to Danny's king. Danny
returned a spade, but declarer cashed the king and queen of spades
(pitching a small diamond) and produced the
J.
Making 6 when a diamond lead would've beaten the contract 3 tricks.
Vul: We
A 3
J 7 2
J 9 8 5 3
A K 2
Lefty starts with ONE NOTRUMP which righty announces is 12 to 14 HCP.
Danny and I play a constructive system called Cappelletti over weak
1NT opening bids. It focuses on showing hands worth overcalling,
especially those with 5 card major suits. Danny bids TWO DIAMONDS
which I ALERT as showing both majors. Generally, he should have
at least 5 of each major, but if he did it on 5-4 and a good opening
bid, then I wouldn't complain.
At this point, I am not sure what to do if righty passes. The hand
should probably be played in game, but which one? 3
should be nonforcing and invitational for partner to continue with
maximum values. A maximum hand in this case would hold
a good 13 or better, because we tend to overcall 1NT with between 11
and 15.
Most of the time, partner will have 5 hearts anyway, and when he doesn't,
then he'll have a good 13 or so. My hard club honours and raggy diamond
protection are making me lean towards suit play with this hand.
Furthermore, I think I'd want to be in game with this hand opposite
most of partner's good 11 counts. 4 seems
about right, but 3NT or 3
could easily be the
winner. Their 1NT has blown us into a guessing game, which is often
the effect of a weak notrump opening bid.
Alas, all of this thought was for naught because righty bids TWO NOTRUMP.
Lefty ALERTS this as the beginnings of Lebensohl a system developed
to cope with interference over partner's 1NT. To explain further,
lefty is forced to bid 3 which
says nothing about clubs. Righty can now show a weak hand with
clubs by passing 3
or a weak hand with
diamonds by bidding 3
. This is a good
system to allow your side to compete with weak distributional
hands.
Looking at my hand, righty can only have one plan. He plans to
pass the 3 bid. How do I feel now? Well,
before the 2NT bid, game for our side was uncertain. Why should I
bid on when a partscore might be our maximum? It is probably
best to play in 3
doubled and beat the field
who are making +140 or -100 our way with a healthy +300 or more.
Accordingly, I PASS, lefty bids THREE CLUBS (completing the relay), Danny PASSES and righty PASSES. I DOUBLE which ends the auction.
Unfortunately, the defense was less than stellar. The contract is booked
for two down, but some slips in the defence cost us a trick in the
wash for one down. My most notable slip in the defense was breaking
too many suits for declarer. Danny's most notable slip on this hand was
having 6 spades and 4 hearts! I'm sure glad I didn't
bid 4!
Vul: They
9 6 5
-VOID-
A Q 9 8
J 10 8 6 4 3
I PASSED and lefty opened ONE NOTRUMP which righty announced as
12 to 14 HCP (yes this was a different pair of opponents). Danny
DOUBLES, which shows a good, penaltyoriented hand. Righty bids
TWO HEARTS which is ALERTED as showing hearts and spades. I want
more information, so PASS seems right. Lefty PASSES and Danny
drops a DOUBLE card on the table. This is PASSED to me.
What's your call?